Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

 

The International Research Journal of Scientific Studies employs a rigorous Double-Blind Peer-Review system. Our process is designed to be fair, unbiased, and transparent, ensuring the highest standards of scientific validity.

Reviewer Selection & Independence

Authors are mandated to suggest three potential reviewers at the time of submission. The details must be entered as per the format specified in the Author Guidelines via the submission portal. While these suggestions are mandatory for submission, the Editorial Board maintains independence in the final reviewer selection to ensure an unbiased, double-blind review system.

The Double-Blind Standard

In our system, the identities of both the Authors and the Reviewers are kept strictly confidential from each other. This prevents any personal bias and ensures the manuscript is judged solely on its technical and intellectual merit.

Reviewer Evaluation Criteria

Originality & Contribution to the Field
Clarity and Coherence of Writing
Validity and Reliability of Methodology
Significance and Impact of Findings
Adherence to Ethical Standards

Editorial Decisions

The Editor-in-Chief reviews the experts' feedback and provides one of the following recommendations:

Accepted
(Without Revisions)
? +
Minor Revisions
(Technical Adjustments)
⚖️
Major Revisions
(Significant Re-submission)
Rejected
(Out of Scope/Quality)

Confidentiality & Ethics

Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and are required to declare any conflicts of interest. The entire process, from initial screening to final proofreading, is treated with absolute confidentiality to protect the author's research and the reviewer's integrity.

© 2026 International Research Journal of Scientific Studies | Quality • Integrity • Transparency